Candyman (MGM Pictures/ Universal Studios)
“A story like that, a pain like that lasts forever.”
Originally posted 8/27/21.
Candyman is a 2021 MGM release directed by Nia Dacosta. The screenplay was written by DaCosta, Win Rosenfeld and Jordan Peele. The film is a sequel, not a remake or reboot of 1992’s Candyman, which was based on a short story by Clive Barker, The Forbidden, published in The Books of Blood anthologies between 1984 and ‘85.Following in the trend of ignoring inconvenient sequels like Superman Returns does with two of its
predecessors, there were follow ups to
Candyman, ‘95’s Candyman: Farewell to
the Flesh, and Candyman: Day of the
Dead in 1999, but this film pretends they never happened.
The first Candyman depicts graduate
student Helen Lyle’s (Virginia Madsen) investigation of a localized urban myth
centered in Chicago’s Cabrini Green housing project, and the horrible fate that
befell her. Helen’s focus is on the legendary Candyman, Daniel Robitaille (Tony
Todd). The Candyman is a towering, horrible, hook-handed revenant associated
with bees, who can be summoned by saying his name five times in a mirror.
DaCosta’s film picks up many years later. The bulk of Cabrini Green has been
razed and rebuilt into high-end apartments. Brianna (Teyonah Parris), an art
gallery director, and her artist boyfriend Anthony (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II), are
relaxing in her opulent duplex after meeting her brother Troy’s (Nathan
Stewart- Jarrett) new boyfriend, Grady (Kyle Kaminsky).Troy tells them the
story of Helen, the Candyman, and her gruesome end.
Anthony’s painting has been stuck in a rut, and the notion of the Candyman
intrigues him. With the help of a long-time resident of Cabrini, William (Colman
Domingo), Anthony begins to delve deeper into the Candyman mythos and unearth his
own past, only to find that some things are better left buried.
Inspired, he creates work after work spawned from William’s tales. He puts on a solo show based on the lynching of Robitaille and the oppression and abuse of the over-patrolling Chicago Police in the Cabrini Green projects. Using the legend of the Candyman as a hammer, and the many mirrored installations in the exhibit as an anvil, Anthony’s art dares the viewers to say his name. When that inevitably happens, the consequences are appalling.
At the same time, Anthony continues to work feverishly and his obsession spins
out of control, threatening his burgeoning art career and his relationship with
Brianna. The line between legend and real life blurs and breaks down as the
bodies begin to pile up.
This movie was a pleasant surprise. Having been disappointed over and over
again by the seemingly endless stream of unnecessary reboots, retcons and
remakes that Hollywood spews out on a regular basis, discovering that this movie
is an actual sequel to the original film was very gratifying. After a 29 year
wait, this movie can join Tron: Legacy,
Sin City: a Dame to Kill For, Bladerunner 2049, and Mobile Suit Gundam: Hathaway, among
others, in the “decades-delayed-sequel” club.
While the first Candyman was more of
a horror-tragedy-romance, (with horror) this is more of an urban anti-hero
origin story. There is a great deal of
social commentary embedded in this film, and the class and race arguments made
are overt. After herding minorities and other undesirable parts of the
population into the public housing projects of Cabrini Green, the city promptly
ignored them and allowed them to rot. Then, using the excuse of the horrible
conditions and crime, they tore down the projects and invited developers to
rebuild for the gentrifiying crowd, providing tax breaks and incentives for
galleries and luxury towers.
This film is not subtle. With the exception of one of William’s flashback
scenes, every single person whacked by the Candyman really, really deserves it.
Most of the kills are White, insouciant, rich and petty. They are almost uniformly
depicted as hostile, toxic invaders of a once wildly-different community. And
then there are the cops. Never around when you need them, never serving nor
protecting, but negligently tromping around like impetuous elephants through
the grass.
This is a pretty good movie. DaCosta is a patient director, content to let her
actors do the heavy lifting, which they do with aplomb. The screenplay pops
with wit. These are well-rendered, real people in a real world, who are aware
of things called “horror movies”. There are many wonderful moments when Brianna
just nopes her way around several
tropes, like the dark staircase leading to the drippy basement. She’s just
like, “Yeah, nope.” It happens a few times, and it’s kind of great.
The music by Robert A.A. Lowe is discordant and jangly at times, often rushing
in when least expected. It makes for wonderful atmospherics and when combined
with the tight editing of Catrin Hedström, his score keeps you anxious and
involved.
There is a wonderful cameo by Tony Todd towards the end, and the movie really
does due justice and respect to its progenitor. I have only two problems with
this movie; one is simply aesthetic. Possibly to prevent aping the slow-footed
serial killers of yore, when not travelling within reflective surface to
reflective surface like a low-rent Mirror Master, the Candyman’s mode of
transportation is a cloud of bees. This hook-handed, towering figure of menace
glides gracefully, deliberately, suspended by a cloud of bees. Yes, it looks as
silly as it sounds.
The second is more of a structural issue. The film feels
like the double-sized, first issue of a comic book. It’s the origin story of a
new Candyman for a new century, instead of a standalone film, but that’s ok.
It’s not a dealbreaker. This movie deserves a sequel, as a sequel is an apt
reward for a smart final girl.
Say his name.
The Candyman was created by Clive Barker.
Candyman opens in theatres on August
27th.
https://fanboyfactor.com/2021/08/movie-review-candyman-mgm-universal-pictures/
Comments
Post a Comment